Get HI5000 Business Acumen Individual Assessment Help

08 Jan 2024

Share via Whatsapp
blog-post-image

HI5000 Business Acumen Individual Assessment Help

 

Unit Details

Name

Business Acumen

Code

HI5000

Year, Trimester

2023, T3

 

Assessment Details

Name

Journal Article Review

Due Date and Week

02/ 02 / 2024, Week 11

 

Individual Student Details

Student Number

 

First Name

 

Family Name

 

 

Submission Declaration

Integrity Declaration

I have read and understand academic integrity policies

and practices and my assessment does not violate these.

Full Name

 

Submission Date

 

 

Instructions

 

Academic Integrity Information

Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding academic integrity. All assessment must comply with academic integrity guidelines. Important academic integrity breaches include plagiarism, collusion, copying, impersonation, contract cheating, data fabrication and falsification. Please learn about academic integrity and consult your teachers with any questions. Violating academic integrity is serious and punishable by penalties that range from deduction of marks, failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment, or Cancellation of course enrolment.

Format Instructions

       Most assessments must be in MS Word format with no spacing, 11-pt Calibri  font and at least 2cm margins on all four sides with appropriate section headings and page numbers.

       Word count is + or - 1500

       You must name your file with the Unit Code and Student ID (e.g. “HI5000 -

GWA1995”).

       Check that you submit the correct document as special consideration is not granted if you make a mistake.

       Student ID needs to be indicated on the cover page.

Penalties

       All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date and time along with a completed Assessment Cover Page. Late penalties apply.

       Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using Holmes Institute Adapted Harvard Referencing. Penalties are associated with incorrect citation and referencing.


 

Career exploration and discovery

 

 

The purpose of this assessment is to select a journal article and to learn from it with respect to your own career wishes and desires. Your job is to: identify issues, gather data, analyze the forces at play in a journal article that is related to career development and recommend appropriate courses of action that will benefit your career.

 

How to proceed and write a Journal Article Review

 

In this assessment the objective is to, “…build learner capacity to identify, gather, summarise and reference academic

research papers related to the discipline of business.”

 

The way you can think about this is that you will be taking another person’s text and:

 

1.  understand it,

2.  summarize it, and

3.  write in your own words your opinion about that text and whether it impacts or is influential with respect to your career.

 

Keep in mind that YOUR opinion matters as much as does the author who wrote the text. You are reviewing their work! They are not reviewing YOUR work!

 

Now, how do you write this?

 1.  Pick a journal (say 10 pages) that is about career development or the career you want to have when you graduate from Holmes.

2.  To get an idea of what the topic is about, “look at the abstract”! Read it very carefully.

3.  WARNING! Don’t start writing until you are fully aware of what the journal article is about.

4.  Read through the article and extract and write a summary of the main points of the article. Write them on a separate piece of paper.


5.  Make certain that supporting facts to the main points are also summarized. If you see words you do not understand just use your dictionary!


6.  Read through the article AGAIN you should really understand the article now.


  7.  Go back to # 4 above and expand the summary of the main points that you have written – and any facts that were used to support them. BUT, this is a summary of the author’s arguments, thoughts and views – NOT YOURS!

  8.  Remember! Use short and simple sentences such as:

“The author thinks that there are strong career opportunities in XXXX.”

“ He also thinks that there are not many opportunities in the banking industry.”

 

So, in summary short sentences not more than 10 words to a sentence!

 

9.  OK, now you should understand what the article is about as you have summarized the main points and have created some paragraphs about the main points.

 

 

So, you can NOW start to express your main thoughts using this structure:

 

 

  Title – keep it short and interesting, e.g. “Career opportunities in the IT industry in XXX”

  Citation, please use Holmes Institute adapted Harvard referencing

  •  Introduction,use it to simply state the main points of the argument. If there are 4 main points then simply speak about these in 4 short sentences–remember less than 10 words per sentence. So,in total it will be about 40 words.


  Your opinion, go back to #7 and use that expanded summary to discuss what your opinion is of the author’s ideas. This is YOUR opportunity to say what YOU THINK! Write in your own words, maximum of 10 words to a line and maximum of 4 sentences to a paragraph.

  Critique, this is your chance to say what you think of what the author said. Is it reasonable or unreasonable? So, you could say, “The author is disappointed about banking employment. (7 words) But he does not offer evidence.” (6 words).

  Summary statement, keep this short but summarize the articles main points and your critique of them

  PROOFREAD, make certain all grammar, spelling, upper & lower cases are correct. Also count the words in your sentences – keep around 10 words per line.

 

 

 

 

Marking Rubric

 

 

Excellent

 

Very Good

 

Good

 

Slightly deficient

 

Unsatisfactory

 

5

4

3

2

1

 

The         report

The

report

The        report

The

report

The report

Structure

of

structure        is

structure

is

structure       is

structure is

structure is non-

the report Max

fully compliant

mostly

compliant but

somewhat

compliant or

5 marks

in all respects

compliant

contains

deficient

unsatisfactory

 

 

 

minor

 

 

 

 

 

shortcomings

 

 

Title

Strong evidence

Evidence of

Acceptable

Present but

Not present

of Journal Article

and

of Business

Business Acumen

unit

reasons are

deficient

Reason for your

Acumen unit in

in choosing this

provided

 

choice

choosing this

scenario

 

 

Max 5 marks

scenario

 

 

 

 

Strong evidence

Good evidence of

Acceptable

Issues identified

Issues identified

Identification of

of understanding

career

evidence of

are only

are not

Unit

of career

issues in this

career

somewhat

adequately

issues in the

issues in

scenario

issues in this

relevant to

relevant to

chosen case Max

5 marks

this scenario

 

scenario

Business Acumen

Business Acumen

 

Possible impact

 

Impact is excellent

 

Impact is very

 

Impact is good

 

Impact is slightly

 

Impact is unsatisfactory

on student’s

 

good

 

deficient

career of the

 

 

 

 

discussion in the

 

 

 

 

journal article

 

 

 

 

Max 5 marks

 

 

 

 

Overall

This submission is

This submission is

This submission is

This submission is

This submission is

Impression

considered

considered

considered

considered

considered

Max 5 marks

Virtuoso and

worthy of a

worthy of a credit

somewhat

unsatisfactory

 

worthy of a high

distinction

distinction

or pass

deficient

 











 

 

Penalties may reduce your actual mark, as follows:

 

 

1.                    Late submissions -5% per day.

2.                    No cover sheet OR inaccuracies on the cover sheet -10%

3.                    Inaccuracies in referencing OR incomplete referencing OR not in Holmes-adapted-Harvard style -10%

4.                    No appendix at end indicating which student wrote which section, or incomplete details entered in appendix -10%

5.                    Submission is not all in one single document -10%

 

 

 

 

 Assessment Citation and Referencing

Rules

 

Holmes has implemented a revised Harvard approach to referencing. The following rules apply:

1.  Reference sources in assignments are limited to sources that provide full-text access to the

source’s content for lecturers and markers.

2.  The reference list must be located on a separate page at the end of the essay and titled:

“References”.

3.  The reference list must include the details of all the in-text citations, arranged A-Z alphabetically by author surname with each reference numbered (1 to 10, etc.) and each reference MUST include a hyperlink to the full text of the cited reference source.


For example:

8. Hawking, P., McCarthy, B. & Stein, A. 2004. Second Wave ERP Education, Journal of Information Systems Education, Fall, http://jise.org/Volume15/n3/JISEv15n3p327.pdf 4. All assignments must include in-text citations to the listed references. These must include the surname of the author/s or name of the authoring body, year of publication, page number of the content, and paragraph where the content can be found. For example, “The company decided to implement an enterprise-wide data warehouse business intelligence strategy (Hawking et al., 2004, p3(4)).”


 

Non-Adherence to Referencing Rules

 

 

Where students do not follow the above rules, penalties apply:

       students who submit assignments that do not comply with all aspects of the rules, a 10% penalty will be applied.

       Students who comply with rules BUT contain ‘fake’ citations will be reported for academic misconduct.

  • Delivery in day(s):
    1
Price : $100 Dollars
Get instant help from 5000+ experts for

Your Email *

Subject/Course Code *

Your PhoneNumber *

Pages *

Deadline *

Attachment *

Description *

;