Get HI5000 Business Acumen Individual Assessment Help
08 Jan 2024
Share via Whatsapp
HI5000 Business Acumen Individual Assessment Help
Unit Details |
Name |
Business Acumen |
Code |
HI5000 |
|
Year, Trimester |
2023, T3 |
Assessment Details |
Name |
Journal Article Review |
Due Date and Week |
02/ 02 / 2024, Week 11 |
Individual Student Details |
Student Number |
|
First Name |
|
|
Family Name |
|
Submission Declaration |
Integrity Declaration |
I have read and understand academic integrity policies and practices and my assessment does not violate these. |
Full Name |
|
|
Submission Date |
|
Instructions
Academic Integrity Information |
Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding academic integrity. All assessment must comply with academic integrity guidelines. Important academic integrity breaches include plagiarism, collusion, copying, impersonation, contract cheating, data fabrication and falsification. Please learn about academic integrity and consult your teachers with any questions. Violating academic integrity is serious and punishable by penalties that range from deduction of marks, failure of the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment, or Cancellation of course enrolment. |
Format Instructions |
• Most assessments must be in MS Word format with no spacing, 11-pt Calibri font and at least 2cm margins on all four sides with appropriate section headings and page numbers. • Word count is + or - 1500 • You must name your file with the Unit Code and Student ID (e.g. “HI5000 - GWA1995”). • Check that you submit the correct document as special consideration is not granted if you make a mistake. • Student ID needs to be indicated on the cover page. |
Penalties |
• All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date and time along with a completed Assessment Cover Page. Late penalties apply. • Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using Holmes Institute Adapted Harvard Referencing. Penalties are associated with incorrect citation and referencing. |
Career exploration and discovery
The purpose of this assessment is to select a journal article and to learn from it with respect to your own career wishes and desires. Your job is to: identify issues, gather data, analyze the forces at play in a journal article that is related to career development and recommend appropriate courses of action that will benefit your career.
How to proceed and write a Journal Article Review
In this assessment the objective is to, “…build learner capacity to identify, gather, summarise and reference academic
research papers related to the discipline of business.”
The way you can think about this is that you will be taking another person’s text and:
1. understand it,
2. summarize it, and
3. write in your own words your opinion about that text and whether it impacts or is influential with respect to your career.
Keep in mind that YOUR opinion matters as much as does the author who wrote the text. You are reviewing their work! They are not reviewing YOUR work!
Now, how do you write this?
1. Pick a journal (say 10 pages) that is about career development or the career you want to have when you graduate from Holmes.
2. To get an idea of what the topic is about, “look at the abstract”! Read it very carefully.
3. WARNING! Don’t start writing until you are fully aware of what the journal article is about.
4. Read through the article and extract and write a summary of the main points of the article. Write them on a separate piece of paper.
5. Make certain that supporting facts to the main points are also summarized. If you see words you do not understand just use your dictionary!
6. Read through the article AGAIN – you should really understand the article now.
7. Go back to # 4 above and expand the summary of the main points that you have written – and any facts that were used to support them. BUT, this is a summary of the author’s arguments, thoughts and views – NOT YOURS!
8. Remember! Use short and simple sentences such as:
“The author thinks that there are strong career opportunities in XXXX.”
“ He also thinks that there are not many opportunities in the banking industry.”
So, in summary short sentences not more than 10 words to a sentence!
9. OK, now you should understand what the article is about as you have summarized the main points and have created some paragraphs about the main points.
So, you can NOW start to express your main thoughts using this structure:
• Title – keep it short and interesting, e.g. “Career opportunities in the IT industry in XXX”
• Citation, please use Holmes Institute adapted Harvard referencing
• Your opinion, go back to #7 and use that expanded summary to discuss what your opinion is of the author’s ideas. This is YOUR opportunity to say what YOU THINK! Write in your own words, maximum of 10 words to a line and maximum of 4 sentences to a paragraph.
• Critique, this is your chance to say what you think of what the author said. Is it reasonable or unreasonable? So, you could say, “The author is disappointed about banking employment. (7 words) But he does not offer evidence.” (6 words).
• Summary statement, keep this short but summarize the articles main points and your critique of them
• PROOFREAD, make certain all grammar, spelling, upper & lower cases are correct. Also count the words in your sentences – keep around 10 words per line.
Marking Rubric
|
Excellent |
Very Good |
Good |
Slightly deficient |
Unsatisfactory |
|||
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|||
|
The report |
The |
report |
The report |
The |
report |
The report |
|
Structure |
of |
structure is |
structure |
is |
structure is |
structure is |
structure is non- |
|
the report Max |
fully compliant |
mostly |
compliant but |
somewhat |
compliant or |
|||
5 marks |
in all respects |
compliant |
contains |
deficient |
unsatisfactory |
|||
|
|
|
minor |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
shortcomings |
|
|
|||
Title |
Strong evidence |
Evidence of |
Acceptable |
Present but |
Not present |
|||
of Journal Article and |
of Business |
Business Acumen unit |
reasons are |
deficient |
||||
Reason for your |
Acumen unit in |
in choosing this |
provided |
|
||||
choice |
choosing this |
scenario |
|
|
||||
Max 5 marks |
scenario |
|
|
|
||||
|
Strong evidence |
Good evidence of |
Acceptable |
Issues identified |
Issues identified |
|||
Identification of |
of understanding |
career |
evidence of |
are only |
are not |
|||
Unit |
of career |
issues in this |
career |
somewhat |
adequately |
|||
issues in the |
issues in |
scenario |
issues in this |
relevant to |
relevant to |
|||
chosen case Max 5 marks |
this scenario |
|
scenario |
Business Acumen |
Business Acumen |
|||
Possible impact |
Impact is excellent |
Impact is very |
Impact is good |
Impact is slightly |
Impact is unsatisfactory |
|||
on student’s |
|
good |
|
deficient |
||||
career of the |
|
|
|
|
||||
discussion in the |
|
|
|
|
||||
journal article |
|
|
|
|
||||
Max 5 marks |
|
|
|
|
||||
Overall |
This submission is |
This submission is |
This submission is |
This submission is |
This submission is |
|||
Impression |
considered |
considered |
considered |
considered |
considered |
|||
Max 5 marks |
Virtuoso and |
worthy of a |
worthy of a credit |
somewhat |
unsatisfactory |
|||
|
worthy of a high distinction |
distinction |
or pass |
deficient |
|
|||
Penalties may reduce your actual mark, as follows:
1. Late submissions -5% per day.
2. No cover sheet OR inaccuracies on the cover sheet -10%
3. Inaccuracies in referencing OR incomplete referencing OR not in Holmes-adapted-Harvard style -10%
4. No appendix at end indicating which student wrote which section, or incomplete details entered in appendix -10%
5. Submission is not all in one single document -10%
Assessment Citation and Referencing
Rules
Holmes has implemented a revised Harvard approach to referencing. The following rules apply:
1. Reference sources in assignments are limited to sources that provide full-text access to the
source’s content for lecturers and markers.
2. The reference list must be located on a separate page at the end of the essay and titled:
“References”.
3. The reference list must include the details of all the in-text citations, arranged A-Z alphabetically by author surname with each reference numbered (1 to 10, etc.) and each reference MUST include a hyperlink to the full text of the cited reference source.
For example:
8. Hawking, P., McCarthy, B. & Stein, A. 2004. Second Wave ERP Education, Journal of Information Systems Education, Fall, http://jise.org/Volume15/n3/JISEv15n3p327.pdf 4. All assignments must include in-text citations to the listed references. These must include the surname of the author/s or name of the authoring body, year of publication, page number of the content, and paragraph where the content can be found. For example, “The company decided to implement an enterprise-wide data warehouse business intelligence strategy (Hawking et al., 2004, p3(4)).”
Non-Adherence to Referencing Rules
Where students do not follow the above rules, penalties apply:
• students who submit assignments that do not comply with all aspects of the rules, a 10% penalty will be applied.
• Students who comply with rules BUT contain ‘fake’ citations will be reported for academic misconduct.
-
Delivery in day(s):
1